HOME > Public sewage pipe is blocked The property has not been fulfilled its management obligations and was sentenced to 40% responsibility

Public sewage pipe is blocked The property has not been fulfilled its management obligations and was sentenced to 40% responsibility

Release Date：2019-03-12 Source：admin

　　Ms.Lubroughttherealestatedevelopmentcompanyandthepropertymanagementcompanytothecourttogetherwiththegrounddraintoblockthepublicsewagepipe,whichcausedthesewagetoreturntothehome,causingthetwodefendantstocompensatethedecorationlossofmorethan50,000yuan.Recently,theIntermediatePeople'sCourtofNantongCityofJiangsuProvincemadeafinaljudgmentonthecase.Thedefendantpropertycompanyfailedtofulfillitsmanagementobligations,assumed40%ofthecompensationliability,andcompensatedtheplaintifffor21,540yuan;rejectedtheplaintiff'sclaimagainsttherealestatedevelopmentcompany.

　　OnMay24,2009,Ms.LupurchasedasetofhousesonthesecondfloorfromNantongWantongRealEstateCo.,Ltd.OnNovember30,2010,Ms.LusignedapropertymanagementserviceagreementwithapropertycompanyinNantongafterdeliveringthehouse,andstayedinthenewhouseattheendof2011.Article2oftheagreementstipulatesthatthecontentsofthepropertymanagementserviceincludethemaintenanceandmanagementoftheequipmentandfacilitiesofthehouse(includingtheupperandlowerwaterpipes)anditsoperation.

　　InSeptember2013,Ms.Lu,whohadbeenoutformanydays,openedherdoorandfoundthatthehousewascoveredwithdirtformorethanayear.Aftertheinvestigationofthepropertycompany,itwasconfirmedthatthegrounddrainleakedthesewagepipeonthefirstfloor,causingthesewagetoreturntothehome.Afteridentification,thevalueofthehousedecorationafterbeingsoakedbywateris53,350yuan.

　　Aftermanyunsuccessfulclaims,Ms.Lufiledalawsuitagainsttherealestatedevelopmentcompanyandthepropertycompany.

　　Therealestatedevelopmentcompanyarguedthattheaccidentwascausedbyimproperuseoftheunitownerorotherhumanfactors,requestingthedismissaloftheplaintiff’sclaim;thepropertycompanyarguedthattheaccidentoccurredwascausedbyimproperdecorationoftheupstairshouseholdorimproperdecorationoftheplaintiff.Theupstairshouseholdortheplaintiffshallbeartheresponsibility,andthesewagepipeintheowner'shouseshallnotbeacommonpartwithinthescopeofthepropertyservicecontract,anditcannotbemaintainedorbelongtoitsmaintenancescope.

　　ThefirstinstanceoftheChongchuanDistrictCourtheldthatiftheinfringementofthepropertyrightscauseddamagetotherightholder,therightholdermayrequestdamages.Theconcealedrealestatedevelopmentcompany'shousingsharingfacilitiesareconcealedandcausedamagetoothers,andshouldbeartortliability.Asthepropertymanagementserviceprovider,thedefendantpropertycompanyfailedtomaintainandmanagethesewagepipelineinvolved,andshouldalsobearresponsibilityfortheloss.Consideringthiscase,theremaybefactorssuchastheimproperuseoftheowner,thelong-termunidentifiedpersonintheplaintiff'shome,andotherfactors.Itisdeterminedthatthetwodefendantsareresponsiblefor40%ofthecompensation,andeachoftheplaintiffscompensates21,540yuan.

　　Afterthejudgmentofthefirstinstance,bothdefendantsrefusedtoaccepttheappeal.

　　Duringthetrialofthesecondinstance,therealestatedevelopmentcompanysubmittedrelevantevidencesuchasthepasstestrecordtothecourttoprovethatthecompanyconductedthepasstestbeforethedeliveryofthecaseonAugust2,2010,andallthe16pipesweresuccessfullypassed.Thetestresultswerequalified,anditwasarguedthatthesewerblockagewasnotrelatedtoit.

　　TheNantongIntermediatePeople'sCourtheldthattherealestatedevelopmentcompanyinthiscasehadpassedtheballtestandpassedtheacceptancetestbeforethedeliveryofthecase,andthecaseinvolvedthehousehasbeenusedforalongtimesincethedeliverytothetimeoftheincident.Thepossibilityoffloordrainleftinthesewagepipeatthetimeofdeliveryisverysmall.Therefore,thecourtoffirstinstancefoundthatthesewageoverflowisalackofbasisfortheconcealedhouseandshouldbecorrected.Ms.Lufailedtoprovideotherevidencetoprovethattherealestatedevelopmentcompanyisatfault,sotherealestatedevelopmentcompanyisnotliableforcompensation.Thecourtoffirstinstancediscretionthatthepropertymanagementcompanyisresponsiblefor40%oftheliabilityinthiscase.Theplaintiff,Ms.Lu,maymakeadditionalclaimstotheactualinfringerfortheremaininglosses.

　　■Connectionjudge■

　　Thepropertyisresponsibleforthedailymaintenancemanagementofthepublicfacilities.

　　Article46ofthe“RegulationsonPropertyManagement”stipulates:“Propertyserviceenterprisesshallstoptheviolationoflawsandregulationsconcerningpublicsecurity,environmentalprotection,propertydecorationanduse,etc.inthepropertymanagementarea,andpromptlyreporttorelevantadministrativemanagement.Departmentreport."

　　Accordingtothepropertymanagementserviceagreement,thefacilitiessharedbytheownersofthesewagepipelinesbelongtothepropertymanagementscopeofthepropertycompany.Thepropertycompanyfailedtomaintainandmanagethisintime.Itisfaulty.Liability.Atthesametime,thepropertymanagementcompanysignedapropertymanagementserviceagreementwiththeowner,andthepropertymanagementcompanyshouldsupervisetheownertoabidebytheServiceDecorationManagementAgreement.Accordingtotheanalysisofthepropertycompany,thefloordrainislikelytofallintothesewagepipelineduetoimproperdecorationoftheupper-flooroccupantsorimproperdecorationoftheplaintiff.Ifthepropertycompanyanalyzesitistrue,itshouldalsobearcorrespondingresponsibilityforitsmanagementdefault.

　　JiJianboremindedthatpropertymanagemententerprisesshouldconductservicesinaccordancewiththeservicecontents,methods,timeandrequirementsstipulatedinthepropertyservicecontract,andregularlymaintainthefacilitiesandequipment.Atthesametime,theownershouldperformthesupervisionandmanagementdutiesproperly,andtheimproperdecorationoftheownershouldbestoppedintime,otherwisetheremaybethepossibilityofbeingcompensated.

Next article：How can a volunteer helper get injured? Last article：How can a volunteer helper get injured?